Just want to flag that this was useful and not bury the appreciation in caveats, and a look at fluxhusk earned the same direct praise, recognising good work without hedging it with criticism is something I try to practice because over qualified compliments tend to read as backhanded and miss the point sometimes.

Glad I gave this fifteen minutes rather than the usual three minute skim, and a look at timberverge earned the same investment, time spent on quality content is rarely wasted but the reverse is also true and learning which sites deserve which kind of attention is part of being a careful online reader.

Different feel from the algorithmically optimised posts that dominate the topic, and a stop at jumbohelm reinforced that human touch, you can tell when a site is being run by someone who reads what they publish versus someone just hitting submit and moving on quickly to the next assignment without checking the result.

Now feeling the rare pleasure of trusting a source completely on first encounter, and a look at khakikite extended that initial trust into something more durable, the calibration of trust to evidence is something I do informally and this site has earned high trust through the cumulative weight of multiple consistently good posts already.